One such theme that will be used, and ultimately standardized in its depiction, will be ownership.
There are so many flavors of ownership across enterprises.
Just to rattle of a few:
- Ownership of clients
 - Ownership of ideas
 - Ownership of team
 - Ownership of employees
 - Ownership of a cell phone
 - Ownership of managers
 - Ownership of projects
 - Ownership of territories
 - Ownership of ownership of organizations
 - Ownership of company
 - Ownership of deliverable
 - Ownership of your own time
 
I know the concept of ownership will proliferate in educational simulations because:
- Ownership require finesses. If you have too much ownership, you loose support and buy-in, and you may define the opportunity too narrowly. But if you have too little ownership, you loose control and accountability.
 - Ownership is a classic "fourth paradox" skill, easy to describe and challenging to appropriately apply.
 - Ownership of something with actuator properties involves trade-offs and benefits
 - Ownership often requires indirect influence, something that works well for simulations.
 - The nuance of ownership is not handled in traditional formal learning programs, in part because it can't.
 - Ownership can also be depicted graphically nicely, even if real-life isn't so clean.
 - And finally, the notions of both increasing and decreasing ownership is critical in all big skills.
 
George Orwell wrote about how not having a word limits one's ability to think about the topic. Ownership today might be an unskill, a concept that we can't get a handle on because the definitions are so vague and we apply them so irregularly as to seldom learn to master them. Hopefully, that will change.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.