Monday, January 8

Quality vs. Speed

Out of 24 participating posts and nearly 40 comments on those posts, not a single person predicted that they would answer all 12 of The Big Questions in 2007 - how disappointing.

Well your first chance to redeem yourself comes in the form of January’s The Big Question:

What are the trade offs between quality learning programs and rapid e-learning and how do you decide?

Please answer this question by posting to your own blog.

(For further help in how to participate via blog posts, see the side bar.)

Points to consider:

  • Quality learning experiences involve having fun, better interactivity in e-Learning or interacting with fellow learners, possible use of games or simulations, richer blends, but designing and developing higher quality programs cost more and take longer.
  • Rapid e-Learning often involves paring back training to the minimum amount and minimal treatment, quickly building those training elements, and providing the remainder of content as reference. This reduces time and cost and may improve scalability because the skills required for development can be easily spread.
  • Most every learning project involves deciding what to treat in what way. So, what ends up on the design room floor by the time of implementation? What are the potential risks of these decisions? Has there been fat that could be cut without risking quality?

The Big Question Response
Tom Haskins
growing changing learning creating
The politics of quality
Tony Karrer
eLearning Tech
Big Question for January - Quality vs. Speed
Matthew Nehrling
The Tao of Design
In The Middle of the Curve
Trading Off
Clive Shepherd
Clive on Learning
The big question for January: quality v speed
Howard Cronin
e-Training in the Trenches
Big Question - January 2007
Karyn Romeis
Karyn's Blog
The big question for January: speed v quality
Clark Quinn
January's 'big' Question
Karl Kapp
Kapp Notes
Rapid E-Learning Trade-Offs
Donald Clark
Big Dog, Little Dog
Knowledge & Learning in the News
David Wilson
Learning Reflections
The Big Question - Rapid or Quality
Adele Lim
learning & development
Jan Big Question
Tom Haskins
growing changing learning creating
High performance netwroks solve the problems
Anil Mammen
Discursive Learning
Speed is not the antithesis of quality
Geetha Krishnan
Simply Speaking
Time for Quality
Dave Lee
e e learning
quality vs. speed - we've created a monster!
Shilpa Patwardhan
Closed World
Motivate to Learn
TATA Interactive Systems
TATA Interactive Systems Corporate Blog
Quality Vs. Speed
patrick dunn
occasional rants
The Big Question is how dumb this Big Question is
Tony Karrer
Learning Circuits Blog
Big Question Follow-up
Tony Karrer
eLearning Technology
Are There Trade-Offs?
Michael Hotrum
Choice Learning
learning development: fast, good or cheap?
Brent Schlenker
Corporate eLearning Strategies and Development
January Big Question...a little late
Valerie Bock
Collaborative Learning
High-Quality Rapid eLearning?
KN Master
Knowledge Narratives
Speed vs. Quality - Still Relevant?
Jacob McNulty
January's Big Question: Speed or Quality?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

^^ nice blog!! ^@^

徵信, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 徵信, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,